 
|
|
Hardcover
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Format: Bargain Price
President Carter, who was able to negotiate peace between Israel and Egypt, has remained deeply involved in Middle East affairs since leaving the White House. He has stayed in touch with the major players from all sides in the conflict and has made numerous trips to the Holy Land, most recently as an observer in the Palestinian elections of 2006. In this book President Carter shares his intimate knowledge of the history of the Middle East and his personal experiences of the principal actors, and he addresses sensitive political issues many British and American officials shy from. Palestine is a challenging and provocative book. Pulling no punches, Carter prescribes steps that must be taken for the two states to share the Holy Land without a system of apartheid or the constant fear of terrorism.
The crowning achievement of Jimmy Carter's presidency was the Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt, and he has continued his public and private diplomacy ever since, winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his decades of work for peace, human rights, and international development. He has been a tireless author since then as well, writing bestselling books on his childhood, his faith, and American history and politics, but in Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, he has returned to the Middle East and to the question of Israel's peace with its neighbors--in particular, how Israeli sovereignty and security can coexist permanently and peacefully with Palestinian nationhood. It's a rare honor to ask questions of a former president, and we are grateful that President Carter was able to take the time in between his work with his wife, Rosalynn, for the Carter Center and Habitat for Humanity and his many writing projects to speak with us about his hopes for the region and his thoughts on the book. A big thank you to President Carter for granting our request for an interview.
An Interview with President Jimmy Carter
 Q: What has been the importance of your own faith in your continued interest in peace in the Middle East?
A: As a Christian, I worship the Prince of Peace. One of my preeminent commitments has been to bring peace to the people who live in the Holy Land. I made my best efforts as president and still have this as a high priority.
Q: A common theme in your years of Middle East diplomacy has been that leaders on both sides have often been more open to discussion and change in private than in public. Do you think that's still the case?
A: Yes. This is why private and intense negotiations can be successful. More accurately, however, my premise has been that the general public (Jewish, Christian, and Muslim) are more eager for peace than their political leaders. For instance, a recent poll done by the Hebrew University in Jerusalem showed that 58% of Israelis and 81% of the Palestinians favor a comprehensive settlement similar to the Roadmap for Peace or the Saudi proposal adopted by all 23 Arab nations and recently promoted by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Tragically, there have been no substantive peace talks during the past six years.
Q: How have the war in Iraq and the increased strength of Iran (and the declarations of their leaders against Israel) changed the conditions of the Israel-Palestine question?
A: Other existing or threatened conflicts in the region greatly increase the importance of Israel's having peace agreements with its neighbors, to minimize overall Arab animosity toward both Israel and the United States and reduce the threat of a broader conflict.
Q: Your use of the term "apartheid" has been a lightning rod in the response to your book. Could you explain your choice? Were you surprised by the reaction?
A: The book is about Palestine, the occupied territories, and not about Israel. Forced segregation in the West Bank and terrible oppression of the Palestinians create a situation accurately described by the word. I made it plain in the text that this abuse is not based on racism, but on the desire of a minority of Israelis to confiscate and colonize Palestinian land. This violates the basic humanitarian premises on which the nation of Israel was founded. My surprise is that most critics of the book have ignored the facts about Palestinian persecution and its proposals for future peace and resorted to personal attacks on the author. No one could visit the occupied territories and deny that the book is accurate.
Q: You write in the book that "the peace process does not have a life of its own; it is not self-sustaining." What would you recommend that the next American president do to revive it?
A: I would not want to wait two more years. It is encouraging that President George W. Bush has announced that peace in the Holy Land will be a high priority for his administration during the next two years. On her January trip to the region, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has called for early U.S.-Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. She has recommended the 2002 offer of the Arab nations as a foundation for peace: full recognition of Israel based on a return to its internationally recognized borders. This offer is compatible with official U.S. Government policy, previous agreements approved by Israeli governments in 1978 and 1993, and with the International Quartet's "roadmap for peace." My book proposes that, through negotiated land swaps, this "green line" border be modified to permit a substantial number of Israelis settlers to remain in Palestine. With strong U.S. pressure, backed by the U.N., Russia, and the European Community, Israelis and Palestinians would have to come to the negotiating table.
1/18/2007
More to Explore
From Publishers Weekly
The term "good-faith" is almost inappropriate when applied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a bloody struggle interrupted every so often by negotiations that turn out to be anything but honest. Nonetheless, thirty years after his first trip to the Mideast, former President Jimmy Carter still has hope for a peaceful, comprehensive solution to the region's troubles, delivering this informed and readable chronicle as an offering to the cause. An engineer of the 1978 Camp David Accords and 2002 recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Carter would seem to be a perfect emissary in the Middle East, an impartial and uniting diplomatic force in a fractured land. Not entirely so. Throughout his work, Carter assigns ultimate blame to Israel, arguing that the country's leadership has routinely undermined the peace process through its obstinate, aggressive and illegal occupation of territories seized in 1967. He's decidedly less critical of Arab leaders, accepting their concern for the Palestinian cause at face value, and including their anti-Israel rhetoric as a matter of course, without much in the way of counter-argument. Carter's book provides a fine overview for those unfamiliar with the history of the conflict and lays out an internationally accepted blueprint for peace.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
| Customer Reviews: |
|
| |
| Fair and balanced |
| Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 |
 |
|
The hooplah calling Jimmy Carter anti-Semitic is hoohah, not only because more Semitic people are Islamic than are Judaic, but also because Carter simply states facts.
|
| Excellent Analysis |
| Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 |
|
|
Jimmy Carter here gives us a fair- minded, deeply felt analysis of the terrible unending conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people. Contrary to the highly charged emotional outcries denouncing it, notably by the Israel Lobby, it is an objective account and should be read by everyone interested in an honest and hopeful account of the MiddleEast stalemate.
|
| An Exceptional Inquiry of the Middle East |
| Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 |
|
|
A few months ago I read "The Fight for Jerusalem" by Dore Gold. I was sadly disappointed by its blatant and intentional slander towards Palestinians and Arabs. The book glorified Israel and argued that Israel's overly aggressive actions are justified. I then read "Palestine: Peace not Apartheid" and was thrilled by its impartiality.
Jimmy Carter gives an insightful analysis into the world of the Middle East. Carter's historical perspective has provided the reader with a look into how the region has gotten to where it is today. The reader becomes aware of the varying events that occurred in the Middle East during Carter's presidency as well as the presidency of Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. This includes different peace agreements such as the Camp David Accords, the Oslo Agreement, the Geneva Initiative, etc. Carter also discusses the transition of leadership in the Middle East that has occurred throughout the years. With his first-hand meetings and discussions with these leaders he is able to give his judgment on the character of these persons. I was also pleased to learn more about the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Hamas, and the politics of both Israel and Palestine.
I think most readers will be shocked at just how justifiably harsh Carter is on Israel. The most powerful chapter of the book, The Wall as a Prison, compares the apartheid that is transpiring in Israel to the apartheid that took place in South Africa. Carter concludes that the Israeli unwillingness to negotiate, unlawful occupation of Arab lands, and mistreatment of Palestinian civilians including women and children are not only illegal in nature but are a major hindrance to the overall peace process in the Middle East.
I was pleased with the clarity of the book and the personal stories of Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, give me a better look at Jimmy Carter as a person, not as a former president. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the history of the region. It will provide much relevance to the events that are happening presently.
|
| Carter's Experiences in Israel and Palestine |
| Customer Rating: 3 out of 5 |
 |
|
I had wanted to read Jimmy Carter's book since it was released in 2006. However, I was finally encouraged to so after watching the documentary about former-President Carter, Man From Plains. That film documented Carter's life during the period of the books release. Having watched all the controversy and what I thought was Carter's honest handling of it, I was a bit let down by the book.
On the controversial piece of the book, I did not think there was anything too troubling in the book. I am a liberal Jew. I find myself a bit more defensive/supportive of Israel than other liberals, though not Jewish ones. Anyway, Carter's basic premise is that the ever growing Israeli settlements are the major barrier to peace. They provide Palestinians a justification for the horrible cycle of violence they perpetuate. I do not think Carter's view is that surprising, unusual, or even troubling. I agree with him. Will a halt to settlements solve all of the problems? No. But it will advance the agenda of peace and fast forward the region to what many believe will be the end point anyway. In addition to those strategic and political reasons, it is probably also the morally right thing to do.
But the book is still a disappointment. It can be read in a few hours as it breezes from Carter's first trip to Israel in the early 1970s, to his work at Camp David for which he gets almost no credit despite the successful Egyptian part of the deal, and to his controversial post-presidency work. Carter only dwells for more than a few pages on the settlements and the security barrier. Because Carter speeds through time with so little detail, it undermines any legitimate points he might make. I have not read Carter's other book on the Middle East, The Blood of Abraham, but maybe that volume has more detail and substance.
Carter is right to highlight where both sides have failed to live up to their agreements and push for peace. There is no shortage of political support for Israel and Carter's book did not change that. That's the good news. The bad news is it did not advance other parts of the debate either, such as the need to deal with the settlements for there to be lasting peace. Israel recognized that when it came to Gaza and I believe most Israelis acknowledge it when it comes to the West Bank. Now peace efforts need to catch up.
|
| Best book ever written to get the insight from Jimmy Carter's personal experience on MidEast |
| Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 |
|
|
First thing first, people who are saying that this book is anti Semite/anti Israel have either not read the book or have missed the point completely. My understanding of anti Semite/anti Israel is someone/action who/which does not accept the EXISTENCE of either Jews or Israel. Just criticizing someone of injustice is not something anti. It is just a attention brought to the public that something is not right and we should correct it. Thats all. If we criticize Bush admin, does that mean we are anti US? No, we are US citizens, we work hard and hate to see injustice taking place anywhere in the world. That is why every country in the world look up to US for help. If Martin Luther King rose to the occasion and openly discussed racism against African Americans, does that mean he was anti US or Anti Whites? If Gandhi would not have spoken against the British, we would not have such freedom in India or sub continent. If Nelson Mandela, spoke of apartheid in South Africa, does that mean he doesn't love his country? I highly recommend Marianne Williamson lecture "Standing up to the Darkness" for every US and Canadian Citizens. You all should know that Jimmy Carter was the main person who brought peace between Israel and Egypt in 1979. And he has visited Israel and met the delegates on many occasions (and continue to meet). So he is in a better position to present his experience than most of us. Many of us have not even met Palestinians or Israeli delegates that many times in our lives than Mr. Carter. Not only that Jimmy Carter have also won the Noble Peace Prize in 2002 for his efforts to bring peace to troubled countries. Also youtube his videos and you will see that he is a noble man and dedicated to peace in the world.
On to the book, the book is REAL LIFE experience. No reference, no assumptions purely based on experience. Carter does not go around keep on bashing Israelis, if you read it even a 10th grader can see that he also criticizes Arab countries for not making effort towards peace. He just doesn't targets Israel. It is a very enjoyable book. In fact very few books which can take my imagination to work and help me visualize the Dead Sea, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem etc visually. Definitely a must read for each and everyone in the world. No one should take this book as a personal attack. There is nothing controversial about it. Carter shares his journey from 70s till 2006 elections in Palestine. He also talks mildly about the Jewish Lobby AIPAC and pressures they put on congress and politicians. For further details in this topic, "Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy" is the best book and some must watch videos at the bottom in my reviews.
He also talks about the change in Israeli thought process with the progress of time. It is quite beautifully presented. His meetings with Yasir Arafat (former PLO leader). Injustice to Palestinian farmers and West Bank wall. Elections in Palestine. In case some of you don't know Carter organization, on o request from the troubled country request, goes and monitor the fair elections. According to Carter Hamas's win in 2006 was the most democratic elections he have monitored in years. The issues with Jordan, Syria, Iran etc. All presented in the book in details. If you are really serious about peace in the world, then this is the book you should read. It is a very easy read as well. Read it and make public aware. This is the best we all can do is educate our self and educate others. Enjoy and Peace.
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror
Youtube videos every North American Citizen should watch:
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
Greta Van Susteren James Traficant
|
|
