Today in Chicago
Monday
03.15.10
Overcast
48.0ºF

Your Messages and MailPersonals and MatchmakerJobs and CareersDance Music 24/7ShopProfilesProfilesProfilesProfiles
Join the Community! (free) or Login:     Password:    
View cart | Checkout


Lt. Dan Choi 
3/15/2010

Suzanne Westenhoefer 
3/10/2010

Shirely Jones 
3/3/2010

Joan Rivers 
3/3/2010

Steven Petrow 
2/24/2010

Patti LuPone 
2/17/2010

Sandra Bernhard 
2/10/2010

More Interviews

Books Music DVD Movies
  Search type

Keyword

Inventory

 

   
You have no items in your shopping cart




Class Action
20th Century Fox
$9.98



John Grisham's The Rainmaker (Special Collector's Edition)
Paramount
$12.98



The Verdict (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)
20th Century Fox
$19.98



Erin Brockovich
Universal Studios
$12.98



The Client (Snap Case)
Warner Home Video
$12.98



The Firm
Paramount
$12.98


  
A Civil Action
by Walt Disney Video

List Price: $14.99
Price: $11.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25.
You Save: $3.00 (20%)

Add this item to your shopping cart

DVD
BUENA VISTA HOME VIDEO
Publisher: Walt Disney Video
Steven Zaillian
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, Letterboxed, Widescreen, NTSC
Actors: John Travolta, Robert Duvall, Kathleen Quinlan, Tony Shalhoub, William H. Macy

Jan Schlichtmann is a cynical, high-priced personal injury attorney who only takes big-money cases he can safely settle out of court. Though his latest case at first appears straightforward, Schlichtmann soon becomes entangled in an epic legal battle ... one where he's willing to put his career, reputation, and all that he owns on the line for the rights of his clients! Also featuring Robert Duvall, William H. Macy, and John Lithgow -- this gripping, widely acclaimed hit delivers edge-of-your-seat entertainment!

Jonathan Harr's nonfiction bestseller was a shot in the arm for those seeking more than last-minute heroics akin to a John Grisham thriller. Here was a labyrinthine case involving industrial pollution by two highly regarded corporations, contaminated drinking water, and the deaths of innocent children in New England, circa 1981. The case has hundreds of twists and takes our hero--a steady, respectable lawyer named Jan Schlichtmann--and turns his life into personal disaster. Instead of celebrating the law, the story is a maddening and rewarding look at the elusiveness of the courtroom case.

Steven Zaillian, who won an Oscar for adapting Schindler's List and directed Searching for Bobby Fischer, boils Harr's 502-page book into a complete, satisfactory film experience. Book readers will no doubt jeer the streamlining Zaillian had to perform to make the movie flow. Most changes can be quickly defused with the exception of the film's portrait of Schlichtmann. The lawyer has been turned into a movie star, an ultra-slick, cold-hearted gentleman who finds his purpose in working the case. Casting a stalwart John Travolta again diverges from the book, which right from the opening pages showed us a Schlichtmann with feet of clay. As Schlichtmann's partners (including William H. Macy and Tony Shalhoub) descend into the case, the unbridled sense of power and money is abandoned. This case is ultimately about survival.

Zaillian provides an excellent narrative for the sordid facts of personal injury suits, in which money is the only reward for lost or broken lives (deftly introduced in the film's opening scene). Zaillian also stays away from dwelling on the illness of the children involved, focusing on the gaunt faces of the parents who survive (Kathleen Quinlan, James Gandolfini) in controlled anguish. His evil characters--an industrial plant's owner (Dan Hedaya) and a corporate lawyer (another fine acting spin by director Sydney Pollack)--are so human it's terrifying. Zaillian's final ace in the hole is Oscar-nominee Robert Duvall. Perfectly cast as Travolta's opposition, Jerome Facher, Duvall steals scenes with the abbreviated dialogue; he turns a fancy settlement meeting into a farce with one line. Facher is not a callous, love-to-hate-him lawyer like James Mason in The Verdict. Facher represents the law at its brilliant foundation: to best represent one's client. With a taped-together briefcase and dry humor, Facher, not Schlichtmann, is the character who captures us by the film's end. --Doug Thomas


Customer Reviews:
 
A Civil Action
Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 
Jan Schlichtmann, a tenacious lawyer, is addressed by a group of families. When investigating the seemingly non-profiting case, he finds it to be a major environmental issue that has a lot of impact potential. A leather production company could be responsible for several deadly cases of leukemia, but also is the main employer for the area. Schlichtmann and his three colleagues set out to have the company forced to decontaminate the affected areas, and of course to sue for a major sum of compensation. But the lawyers of the leather company's mother company are not easy to get to, and soon Schlichtmann and his friends find themselves in a battle of mere survival. "A Civil Action" is a great courtroom movie. John Travolta is great here and so is the rest of the cast, among them William H. Macy, Kathleen Quinlan, Sydney Pollack, John Lithgow, Stephen Fry, in a small cameo role, Kathy Bates, in an even smaller cameo role, and the great Robert Duvall. In the end, it is Duvall who steals the show in his quiet, unemotional musings, advice-givings and deliberations with Travolta. He embodies the restraint for which the movie strives. This is a great movie that is very entertaining.


Pretty darned good. Travolta is excellent. A sad portrayal of big-time civil litigation
Customer Rating: 4 out of 5 
There is a lot in this film that rings true regarding big-time (or any) civil litigation. What resonated with me is the fact that the protagonist law firm really busted its tail for its clients, and ultimately the clients were not grateful. Show me the lawyer who has not experienced this! The film's depiction of the ungrateful lead client is priceless.

Travolta is outstanding as the motivated plaintiff's attorney, and Robert Duvall turns in his customary excellent performance as the Beatrice defense counsel. There are apparently significant differences in Massachusetts rules of civil procedure from those in California (where I practice). The problems that the plaintiff had as depicted in the film would not occur here. (No more details for fear of spoilers.)

Overall, this is an accurate picture of some of the dynamics of contingency civil litigation. If nothing else, it educates the viewer as to why most civil litigation is not done on a contingency basis, contrary to what the public often perceives.

I enjoyed this one and would watch it again, but this is not an uplifting film, which is too bad. RJB.

Good for whole family
Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 
My family is very cautious about what we watch, and this is the perfect family movie. It is suspensful and entertaining, very heartfelt. Great acting.

Cleaning Up a Mess
Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 
A voice explains the worth of a person in tort law. A young child is worth the least, a white middle-aged professional is worth the most. A Massachusetts hospital is being sued, the lawyers agree to a settlement after the jury is selected. [Does this match your experience?] Personal injury lawyers are the sole defense against a corporation for the average citizen. The small town of Woburn lost a dozen young children to leukemia. They blame contaminated drinking water, but that may be difficult to prove. Will Jan Schlichtman take this case? It takes a lot of money to bring a case to trial. Fate brings Schlichtman to that industrial site where waste is dumped into the river. The need for a lunch hour is explained (to promote sanity in a hectic environment).

The judge seems biased against personal injury lawyers. Rule 11 is old and ambiguous. Discovery goes on to learn about waster disposal from the industries. One witness knows something. "Did you ever eat peanut butter?" Silicone and TCE are spilled on leather for waterproofing; where does the waste go? The costs for doctors and geologists are high. They must borrow money from a bank for expenses. One employee tells more to Jan. Another man tells what they did: just dumped it in the ground. Most cases are settled not tried. Jan gives his price for a settlement. Too high?

The trial begins. A civil suit is over money for suffering and damage. The witnesses testify. A phone call brings Jan to the judge's chambers. If they can't prove the chemicals reached the wells there is no case. The jury must decide three questions. Jerry talks about Truth and a Court of Law. Will Jan settle for $20 million? Or less? What is the trial about? Money or Justice? There is a settlement. After costs and fees there is $375,000 per family. Will that site be cleaned?

Jan remembers about spilling that glass of water. Somebody had to clean it up, and there will be records. How could a fire ignite water? Jan would file an appeal, the odds are against it. But he can't afford it so he sends the records to the EPA (they have the resources). The result was the closure of the factories in Woburn. Jan filed for bankruptcy. What happened? After paying off debts Jan took on a similar case in Toms River NJ.


Fair
Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 
The cassette was in very good condition. The story: my wife loves real life movies and if it has her favorite actor... imagine. She loved it.




Login | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Media Assets | Webmasters / RSS | Advertise

Sponsorship or Partnerships | Contact the Editor | Email the President | Press Inquiries | Contact Us

Become a fan of ChicagoPride.Com on FacebookBecome our friend on MySpaceBecome our friend on MyPrideBecome our friend on Twitter
Serving Boystown and Gay Chicago since 1995
© Copyright 1995-2010 All rights reserved. Info on this site is strictly for entertainment purposes.



03/15/2010 03:09P